Could Patrick Murphy wake up Florida Democrats on environmental issues?

Democrats claim to care about the environment. This legislative session we saw the Republicans push fracking and water legislation which are incompatible with the values of most Floridians on environmental issues. Yet for the most part Democrats have de-emphasized environmental issues. The de-emphasis of environmental issues by Florida Democrats, I believe no doubt hurt the Obama campaign in 2012 along the Treasure Coast and SW Florida, and Charlie Crist similarly struggled in 2014 despite the NextGen ads that ran statewide.

Martin, Indian River, Charlotte and Collier counties have been traditionally anti-growth and in favor of punishing polluters in order to fund Everglades restoration. In fact, the only area where Congressmen and legislators from these two regions have broken with GOP orthodoxy over the past two decades is on issues related to environmental protection and preservation. Collier has shifted towards a more pro-growth posture recently, but it is not without serious local opposition that this has taken place.

Florida Democrats often forget the importance of medium-sized counties where the GOP cleans up in statewide elections. The  counties listed above all have serious environmental concerns that have not been articulated forcefully by Democrats who have run statewide. But perhaps Patrick Murphy begins to change that.

Congressman Murphy having represented the Treasure Coast in Congress understands the importance of these issues. Irrespective of some of his other positions that are incompatible with progressiveness, on environmental issues he has taken a leadership role, be it on clean water, beach erosion, climate change

The Everglades Coalition gave Murphy their “Distinguished Public Service Award” in 2015.In receiving the award the organization stated the following:

“Since his election to the United States Congress in 2012, Patrick Murphy has quickly proved himself
to be an up-and-coming champion for America’s Everglades… Congressman Murphy has worked
above and beyond in his service to Floridians and indeed all Americans to reach across party lines
and facilitate meaningful progress for the Everglades.”

In addition, Murphy was honored by Audoboun Society last year for working hard on Everglades-related issues. He has also been given credit by activists for tirelessly devoting energy to get Kissimmee River restoration back on track. He also had yet to accept a check from sugar, a laudable and principled stand though we will continue to track this closely as Murphy’s fundraising operation ramps up and his need to access money increases.

Murphy has also worked hard on the Indian River Lagoon issue as has been pointed out before on this site. However, his troubling Keystone XL pipeline vote remains problematic as do some of his other economic-related stands. On the issue of the Everglades, depending on your perspective (since some otherwise progressive people don’t find Everglades restoration to be an important issue), Murphy could be identified as a strong liberal advocate and voice. In the past it could be argued that south Florida Republican members of Congress from yesteryear such as the late E. Clay Shaw and former CIA-director Porter Goss worked hard on Everglades issues and avoided taking sugar money, unlike some of their local Democratic counterparts.

The Everglades issue might demonstrate how out of touch the southeastern part of the Florida is with the rest of the state. For many Florida progressives outside the southern part of the state, the Keystone XL pipeline issue might prove to be a bigger deal than Murphy’s liberal stands on the Everglades, Indian River Lagoon and Climate Change.

Murphy is far from the ideal Democratic candidate for most progressives. However, his record on localized environmental issues could help finally re-position a Florida Democratic Party whose rhetoric and values have been out of touch on the most critical local issues in the southern part of the state. Let’s hope Murphy’s embrace of these issues teaches Florida Democrats that running aggressively on environmental matters can make a big difference in Florida, especially in areas where the Republicans currently dominate proceedings.


  1. dianecbrown · · Reply

    I try to be civil in my post, but this column is freakin’ BS!!!! Kartik, you are SO WRONG with your (usual) generalization of all Democrats “de-emphasizing” environmental issues. I am sure I have been following/PARTICIPATING in improving on environmental issues in Florida a lot longer than you’ve been alive. You throw out these radical ideas with no examples, or substantiation.


    1. The generalization is true. Democrats get more money from sugar as a percentage of their overall money then Republicans. They also have not campaigned aggressively on these issues in years. But Kartik is dead wrong if he somehow thinks Patrick Murphy voted for the Keystone XL pipeline is going to change things!!!!


      1. dianecbrown · ·

        John, please provide facts to prove your statement that more Dems receive money from sugar than Repubs. While you are at it, you must have names of Dems and Repubs who were entertained at sugar’s Texas resort. Give us those too.


  2. Half true. I completely agree that Florida Democrats thanks to the proliferation of sugar money and other dirty Money have not emphasized environmental issues the way they should in spite of positive polls. But if you really think Patrick Murphy a blue dog Democrat is the guy to revive the party on this you need to have your head examined!!!!


    1. dianecbrown · · Reply

      I knew very little about Murphy before he decided to run for senate, but I have to say it made an impression when I read the survey sent to him by a Dem org, maybe Dem Progressive Caucus, that actually asked either would he join, or would he promise not to join the Blue Dog Caucus if reelected. I thought – why do you have to ask a modern day Dem that question. Now I know!!


  3. · · Reply

    The credibly of the Democrat commitment to the environment was destroyed by the candidacy of Corry Westbrook who claimed to be an environmental lobbyist. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement spent a year on a criminal investigation and determined that she had violated Florida multiple laws.The FDLE recommended her arrest and prosecution for multime felonies.

    The on-line web site documented that Corry Westbrook had plagariszed many of the policy positions of Congressman Patrick Murphy.


    1. dianecbrown · · Reply

      What a ridiculous statement!! One candidate who may, or may not have been a bad environmentalist does not reflect the performance or dedication of Democrats in general.


  4. he only worked on those issues because of the district he represented.

    As you have put in your piece is an area where a lot of Republicans and independents are environmentalists

    statewide he will shift to the right on those issues.

    He will echo the Florida Democratic mantra which is to run conservative candidates who can appeal to rule voters in North Florida and the interior of the state.

    This means largely ignored in the environment.


    1. dianecbrown · · Reply

      I don’t doubt what you are saying about Murphy’s localized environmentalism. But as a hardcore populist Democrat in N. Florida, who doesn’t like being lumped in with N. FL blue dogs, I would like to see numbers (by district) of the N. FL conservative Dems that Murphy thinks he has to court.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: