Following the landfall of Milton Governor DeSantis claimed climate change had nothing to do with increased tropical activity and the size of storms by cherry picking some data about strength of storms around the center. This is almost irrelevant when we talk about the widespread effects of more recent storms that have impacted the states since 2017 and compare them to storms from the 1920s and 1960s and even the 1990s.
Join 3,197 other subscribers
Categories
Recent Posts
- Are the wheels coming off MAGA in Southeast Florida?
- MY NEW BOOK UNCOVERS FLORIDA’S FORGOTTEN ROLE IN U.S. FOUNDING ERA FOR AMERICA 250
- Ken Burns and the MAGA hissy fit over “woke” documentary –
- New book on American Revolution in Florida now available from Casemate publishers
- Op-ed: Memorial Park Controversy Shows How Tone Deaf Boca Raton’s Leaders Have Become
- Why Canada Never Became Part of the US- New book out next week
- A message from Kartik Krishnaiyer on the future of TFS
Archives
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013






It’s interesting and maybe ironic that the U.S.’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have declined as we use more natural gas than coal, since around 2005 (or 2008?), I believe. Globally, if China and India are any indication, GHG emissions, has gone in the other direction. Also, US, climate change could be delayed by time – for it to be coincident would be a little freakish, but not impossible. Either way, the theory of the case of man-made climate change is that the industrial revolution caused climate change, right? (At least that is when we really began pumping a lot of coal emissions into the atmosphere.) Do we have enough data prior to the 1850s to make a good comparison? I’m not denying things are changing, just wondering.
LikeLiked by 1 person
i’d argue one of the major mistakes liberals have made about this climate change issue is building their case around carbon emissions and greenhouse gases. That’s not what is at play here. What’s at play here is sea level rise. In addition to over population of the Florida Peninsula. Overdevelopment building in environmentally sensitive areas, the issues we’ve had with water flow because of Human construction projects. All of that furtgers climate change it’s not just about carbon emissions missions.
LikeLike
That’s brings up the issue of how insurance/recovery money will be spent? My guess is outside of positive state government action (not a DeSantis specialty), we will continue to rebuild on barrier islands which will be knocked down by the next storm?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The insurance situation is going to be untenable after this, and honestly, the state is becoming more and more unsustainable. Just like every phase of Florida history a bubble for short term, profits that ends up bursting.
LikeLike
Yeah. I’m hoping you will add to the article about Florida’s Bubble Bursting. I think the storms have given the newcomers a bit of buyers remorse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
LikeLiked by 1 person
If climate change is man-made and will irreversibly lead to rising sea levels, what should Florida prioritize? Building more, and more effective, sea walls? Prioritizing the switch from oil and coal to natural gas and/or renewables? Much of conventional wisdom has been to switch to renewables as if there would be zero cost for the transition. As that is not the case, is it a viable policy choice and how much of a difference would it make if global GHGs continue to increase?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be an interesting time to be in D.C. In ’92 Florida was still a swing state and the Bush Administration seemed to increase the amount of money coming to Florida by the day. I would imagine the Biden Administration is likely doing the same but probably for Georgia or North Carolina in this case.
LikeLiked by 1 person
More importantly, the Bush administration in 2004 when we got hit by multiple hurricanes. Andrew was an isolated event for the most part – only impacted extreme Southeast Florida. Though granted for those places, it was like a nuclear bomb went off.
Much of the national media wanted to act like Florida didn’t take the brunt of Helene by ignoring us, even though Pinellas was completely messed up and has a higher population than any place impacted significantly by the storm in North Carolina or Georgia . My Soccer interests in Pinellas County are really discombobulated now and I’m not sure we’re going to be able to get them back humming anytime soon. The double whammy of Helene and Milton really did them in.
LikeLike
I wonder if many Midwesterners from the Tampa/Orlando region will be packing their bags? If real estate prices start slipping some banks/bond funds could face some turbulence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I bet many will…
LikeLike