We’ve seen just about every imaginable breakdown of votes from the 2016 Presidential Election. But it was surprising to see no breakdown by MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) as defined by the Census Bureau.  From my vantage point, the below chart which we’ve worked out using votes for only the two major party candidates paints an ugly picture for Democrats. The party has been reduced to small portions of the state in terms of winning at the top-of-the-ticket and while two decades ago, Democrats down ballot could comfortably run above the national ticket if they had a strong local base, today if anything the national ticket provides the high-water mark for Democrats outside of some small rural counties. Down ballot, Democrats have consistently in the last four elections run worse than at the top of the ticket throughout much of the state.

The below chart also paints a picture of a party that has ignored medium-sized metro areas and suburban communities outside of South Florida and Orange & Osceola counties. A few notes – the Miami-Fort Lauderdale MSA was combined with the West Palm Beach-Boca Raton MSA in 2003, but retains the Miami-Fort Lauderdale name. We used MSA’s here not CMA’s (Combined Metropolitan Area).

The margins Donald Trump took out of most of these medium sized areas of the state help explain how he won Florida by over 100,000 votes. It is worth remembering Hillary Clinton was about as weak a nominee as the Democrats have produced in the post-war era against a non-incumbent GOP President so perhaps these numbers represent a low point for the D’s.

Two party vote only: