Ana Rivas Logan party switch not worth crowing about

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERASelf-preservation is a key component in most politicians DNA. Self-pity is another, and when things go wrong in within a political party we often times see feuding, fussing and even party switching. The history of party switching in Florida during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s sometimes had to do with conviction but usually had more to do with political winds, personal  issues or future opportunities for office.

Yesterday’s news that Ana Rivas Logan, a former  Miami-Dade county School Board member and state legislator  had defected from the GOP to the Democrats sent off celebrations and speculation among some in her new party, but also was met with consternation by many more issues based Democrats.

Rivas Logan when serving on the Miami-Dade School Board was a strong proponent of the school “choice” initiatives that the GOP under Jeb Bush made a fundamental tenet of their ideology in the state during the 1990s and 2000s. Then as a State Legislator she voted as a GOP partisan opposing women’s reproductive rights and gay rights, while supporting more school “choice” plans and the Republican economic agenda.

Her party switch is bizarre if looking from an ideological perspective. Recent converts to the Democratic side like Nancy Argenziano and Charlie Crist had issues where they most certainly aligned with Democrats. Crist perhaps out of opportunism and Argenizano more out of conviction (The former State Rep. and State Senator was always independent minded and her party switch was a natural progression of things). But Crist was never a hard-right conservative even when he was in the State Senate angling to be a player in the GOP- he was conservative but never accumulated the sort of voting record Rivas Logan did, which was largely in lockstep with Speaker Dean Cannon and incoming leader Will Weatherford.

Party switching in this state began in earnest in the 1970s when some Democrats were concerned about the direction Reubin Askew was taking the state. Askew who was named one of the ten best US Governors of the 20th Century by Harvard University set Florida on an activist modern course economically setting up almost three decades of unparalleled growth, and institutional reform. The state’s Democratic Party was one of the most corrupt when Askew became Governor and by 1979 when he left office the state had some of the strictest ethics laws on the books nationally.

In 1982, Northwest Florida Conservative State Senator Tom Tobiassen switched from Republican to Democrat to prevent a district from disappearing in the House he decided to run for. In 1995, W.D. Childers, also from the Pensacola area and a former Democratic Senate President became a Republican because the GOP had captured the chamber. Just three years earlier when Republican leadership failed to back up a moderately conservative Seminole County member Frank Stone in the midst of a local political crisis, he switched parties to become a Democrat. Tobiassen was a conservative (who even talked of secession for NW Florida at times) that fit into a Democratic caucus that at the time was full of conservatives from rural areas. At the time the GOP held very rural seats in either chamber, essentially being reduced to suburban areas around the state.

In the late 1990s a number of Democratic House members switched parties to become Republicans after the GOP captured the chamber in 1996. In total, seven Democrats elected to the State House in the 1996 election when the GOP took a 61-59 edge in the lower chamber defected to the GOP before the start of the 2000 session. While some that switched parties had hardly voted with Democrats even when in the majority, others were simply doing it to obtain a committee chairmanship or enhance election prospects. As someone who worked in the process as a Democrat at the time it was a psychologically draining experience to go through all these party switches in rapid succession.

However, NONE of the 1997-1999 party switches were of liberal Democrats who voted a strongly partisan or ideological line. Rivas Logan is the first recent legislator to have had a down the line voting record for one party that switched to the other quickly. But Rivas Logan, like a lot of the Democrats who flipped a decade and a half ago comes from an area of the state where political winds are changing rapidly. Miami-Dade is the only large county in the state where Barack Obama ran significantly better in 2012 than in 2008. For an ambitious politician like Rivas Logan getting out ahead of a possible collapse in the GOP hegemony in local legislative districts was probably the calculus.

The Democratic National Chairwoman Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said the following about the switch.

“Her story is a powerful testament to just how far right the GOP has drifted and how many communities it has alienated — especially women and Hispanics.” “Republicans promised to change their ways following the 2012 election, but instead have doubled down on the same far right policies that drive away voters and public servants like Ana. And particularly in Florida — where, again and again, Republican leaders have taken a hard line against the state’s most underserved people purely for political gain — we are proud that Ana is standing up to say, enough is enough.”

Based on that statement Rivas Logan should be embraced by all Democrats. But the sentiments in Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s comments don’t reflect the reality of Rivas Logan’s record. I’d like to know where she stands on a multitude of issues and why she flipped to being a Democrat beyond personal ambition and preservation. I am sure others want to know as well.

10 comments

  1. Blue Dog Dem's avatar
    Blue Dog Dem · ·

    She’s an idiot to boot having dealt with her personally.

    Like

  2. Patti Lynn's avatar
    Patti Lynn · ·

    The Democratic Party welcomes everyone, but this is a little tough to take. If she is anti-reproductive rights; if she supports school vouchers for secular schools and charters; if she is anti-gay marriage; if she does not support the Equal Rights Amendment; if she does not support the constitutional protection that the LGBT community is entitled to: In any of these cases, we have just let a fox into the henhouse. The Democratic Party should not support her election to any rule or lawmaking body.

    Like

    1. Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

      My guess is that she will try to flip on most of these issues now though the voucher one I am still suspicious of because she was not just pro-voucher BUT a loud proponent of them. Still her previous voting record had zero tinges of moderation. Guns also she was terrible on.

      Like

  3. demdaysi's avatar

    I wish the democrats would stop shooting themselves in the foot and grabbing all the rotten fruit that drops out of the republican bushes. Get some democratic self confidence for God’s sake.

    Like

    1. Susan Smith's avatar

      or as my friend called it, “GOP dumpster diving.”

      Like

  4. Joe Kreps's avatar

    Who’s next, Gingrich or Huckabee?

    Like

  5. Dave Trotter's avatar

    Seriously….this is Crist Part II. Rivas Logan cannot win the GOP Primary and the only way that she can enter into the race is for her to be a Democrat.

    The Crist situation has caused a huge problem for Democrats. Weaker Republicans see that the FDP will bow to anyone who switches parties, and kiss their ass as well.

    So, hypothetically, let’s say I am a Republican who just lost in 2012. The Democrats have never run anyone strong in my district. I know I cannot win the GOP primary nowadays. And in addition, with all of the “love” the FDP is giving party-switching Charlie, I know that I will not have a primary opponent and can make it to the general. I don’t have to change any of my views on the issues and keep my core conservative values. Because the demographics are changing in my district, I have as much of a chance of winning as a Democrat as I do a Republican. But since I automatically will make it to the general election, and the FDP is kissing my ass, I can now get more money to compete against the Republican than if I did in a GOP primary.

    Then, let say, I win. I keep voting like a conservative in the Legislature. But since I am now an elected Democrat, the FDP will continue to pump money into my reelection campaign so that I retain the seat.

    For those who just want to “be there”, why wouldn’t former GOP members just switch parties? There are no principles when it comes to Democratic Party politics in the State of Florida anymore. This was exactly the type of change that everyone knew that Tant would bring to the party. And guess what, you now have that change. Good luck with that!

    Like

    1. Kartik Krishnaiyer's avatar

      Dave you have said some ridiculous things in the past but I think you nailed this one to the tee. Nothing more to add to that honestly. Would make a good blog post actually 🙂

      Like

      1. Dave Trotter's avatar

        I’m always right 🙂

        Wait…I was wrong with saying Joe Saunders would lose in 2012 and McCain would win Indiana in 2008….but I think that is it. Yeah, I have been wrong once or twice. I like my record 🙂

        Like

  6. Mark Lynn's avatar
    Mark Lynn · ·

    This reminds me of another party switch that Kartik forgot to mention. Near the end of the 1988 Legislative session, State Rep. Arnhilda Gonzalez-Quevedo (R-Coral Gables) abruptly switched parties and became a Democrat. I remember colleague State Rep. Elaine Gordon (D-North Miami) presenting her with a bouquet of red roses and escorting her to her new seat near the front of the chamber, while fellow Dade Reps. Rudy Garcia and Javier Souto sat stone faced in silence. Arnhilda switched for some vague reason concerning the Reagan administration’s Cuba policy. In reality, she had often voted with the Democrats in the House and was the most moderate of the Cuban-American legislators at that time. Democrats were also hoping to lure Arnhilda into one of two open State Senate races (Dists. 33 & 40), both containing small areas of her House District. Ultimately she could not run because she switched too late according to the law at that time. Arnhilda dropped her married name and became known as Arnhilda Badia after that. I knew her during this time and liked her very much. She was also a very talented legislator. I’d love to see her return to the political arena. She would have defeated Erik Fresen in ’12 had we run her instead of the very weak Ross Hancock. Not a doubt in my mind.

    Ana Rivas Logan was a better school board member than legislator, but then again she only served one term in the House. I didnt always agree with her, but I certainly welcome her to the Democratic Party!! She could be a good candidate for us in the future, as our bench is very weak.

    Like