How will Big Sugar survive the DeSantis years?


By Parvathisri – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Irrespective of how you might feel about Ron DeSantis’ other policy positions (though based on his early days as Governor-Elect, DeSantis’ is appearing more pragmatic than his predecessor Rick Scott) , his strong advocacy of  Everglades makes him perhaps the first Governor since the 1960’s completely independent of the sugar industry.  The prospect of a truly balanced policy toward Everglades restoration should excite all Floridians, particularly those from the southern portion of the Peninsula. 

Big Sugar spent lots of money in the GOP Primary to ensure the nomination Adam Putnam. An estimated $3 million was thrown into the primary to defeat DeSantis and nominate Putnam. Why?  As Agriculture Commissioner, Putnam did virtually nothing to enforce existing laws on the books that forced sugar to account for the amount of phosphorous and other pollutants it was putting into the water. Data has long been available that demonstrates sugar farms are a major source of contamination.  

Meanwhile, DeSantis had staked out a lonely position against sugar. A position that lazily today might be considered leftist, but could actually be seen as (traditionally) conservative because someone has to pay for the cleanup and restoration of the Everglades. Making sugar pay its fair share keeps the tax burden on citizens and other businesses in the state lower. 

The industry might run into trouble with Democrat Nikki Fried as Agriculture Commissioner but we’ll save that for another day – because it’s DeSantis’ victory that now has sugar, the overlords of so many politicians of both political parties and all ideologies very nervous. 

The win by DeSantis in both primary and November was the first major political setback for the industry in years. On the Democratic side, sugar preferred not to see Andrew Gillum nominated – but Gillum’s surrounding cast of characters ,sugar links prevented him from taking the strong stand DeSantis did against the industry.  


By Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America – Ron DeSantis, CC BY-SA 2.0,

DeSantis represents a throwback to when Conservative Republicans worked hand-in-hand with Liberal Democrats to fight the transactional wings of both parties that were in the pocket of the sugar industry. In the 1990’s Republican leaders like future CIA Director Porter Goss, then a Congressman, State Representative Tom Warner, Congressman Ric Keller and many other Republicans targeted the sugar industry in alliance with liberal Democrats. 

The late Republican Congressman E. Clay Shaw of Fort Lauderdale, a perennial Democratic target was hated by the sugar industry. Every two years when the Democrats put up a challenger to Shaw, they could count on sugar’s big support.  In fact, I was told in 2000, sugar informed the national and state Democratic Party’s they could have “whatever they needed” to take out Shaw and replace him with State Rep. Elaine Bloom in Washington. 

What happened in the 2000’s was a rapid consolidation of both parties behind a pro-sugar, slowed down Everglades cleanup agenda.  Environmentally conscious Democrats stopped talking about the Everglades and the anti-sugar Republicans eventually disappeared with Rick Scott Governorship representing sugar at its apex. 

During the Scott years, the industry controlled the Governorship, all the cabinet seats and the usually the leadership of the legislature in BOTH parties with few exceptions. Thus, DeSantis’ election represents a major threat to an industry that has effectively slowed Everglades restoration thanks to buying its way through the legislative process. 


In a televised Gubernatorial debate on CNN two weeks before the election, both major party nominees soundly ridiculously similar on the issue of the Everglades, with one key distinction – Gillum cleverly danced around naming sugar directly whereas DeSantis went right after them and tried to goad Gillum into hitting them. 

The problem for Gillum  was that despite his progressive instincts on the issue,  the attachment of other elements in the Democratic Party to sugar forced him to the middle. Lobbyist/consultant Sean Pittman who is closely connected to the Tallahassee Mayor, lobbies for Florida Crystals, while many of the elected officials from southern Florida who had endorsed Gillum have close ties to the industry. The Florida Democratic Party raised a ridiculous amount of money from sugar when Gillum’s top strategist Scott Arceneaux was its Executive Director. 

Similarly DeSantis has many supporters connected to sugar beginning with Governor Scott. However, having publicly bucked sugar in the primary against Putnam and survived bullets from every direction with sugar funding, DeSantis felt this was an issue to show his independence on.  Florida’s voters elected a Governor committed to holding the industry accountable. 

Sugar and its front groups spent tons of money funding Governor Rick Scott, particularly in his 2014 reelection effort. A hope had emerged prior to the 2014 election, that Charlie Crist who had a love-hate relationship with the industry would empower those concerned about the Everglades ecosystem over sugar’s lobbyists.

Crist’s own ties to the environmental movement were strong, but even though he had tried to buy US Sugar’s land in 2008, he never crossed the line DeSantis did this year in publicly blaming the industry for many of the problems the Everglades continues to suffer. 

Scott’s reelection allowed sugar, already in full control of the state to run wild the last four years. The presumption in official Tallahassee and among the chattering classes that Scott would be replaced by either Putnam or the moderate Gwen Graham gave sugar even more leverage. The emergence of DeSantis caught the industry off guard and despite spending an estimated $3 million against him in the GOP primary, they lost. 

The industry has given money to lots of Democrats, even liberal firebrands like Alan Grayson and Rob Wexler.  This has allowed an industry more responsible for the problems in the Everglades than anyone outside the Army Corp of Engineers virtual autonomy and exemptions from existing laws and rules.  It has frustrated the federal government to no end – as DeSantis made clear in the campaign, someone has to pay to clean up the Everglades and by not making sugar pay their fair share, that burden is passed on to Florida’s taxpayers and law-abiding businesses. 


I have no doubt sugar will redouble its efforts among Democrats now to push back against DeSantis’ looming efforts. Democrats by and large have grown soft on the issue of Everglades restoration. Some have even touted the “science” of sugar’s claims that they are actual partners in restoration rather than the chief pollutant. There is zero doubt this lobbying effort which has successful conned some Democratic elected officials who are more concerned with issues of social justice or identity than the environment will continue in earnest. 

Similarly, sugar will likely try and influence Nikki Fried, thought not to be a friend of the industry but still not as hardened as DeSatnis. But in Fried they face a challenge- if DeSantis pushes the Agriculture Commissioner to start enforcing existing statutes related to sugar and Everglades cleanup, she is likely to side with him over the industry. 

They will also solidify support among other Cabinet officials Jimmy Patronis and Ashley Moody. Among Republicans in the legislature, the industry will continue to rely on its donations to candidates to have both chambers bottle up anything proposed by the Governor. 

The opportunity for DeSantis to reverse the course of history, where sugar has fought and defeated ballot amendments that put the burden of the cleanup on them, where sugar has meddled in both party’s primaries to get the most anti-sugar and environmentally conscious people defeated, and where sugar has been able to effectively delay elements of Everglades restoration for two decades is real. DeSantis from my conversations with those around him seems intent on pushing sugar to face the consequences of its action. 


From where I sit, it does not matter your views on other issues or your general political ideology – if you don’t support DeSantis’  coming efforts you care more about a special interest group than the welfare of the southern part of this state. Shame on anyone who feels that way. 


  1. DeSantis is a racist Trump tool so expect corruption.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The League of Conservation Voters and Trump do not think DeSantis an environmentalist because he is not one.


      1. The Everglades Coalition backed DeSantis.

        He’s bad on most environmental issues but has been all over toxic algae and sugar related pollution.

        Give him a chance.


      2. It’s very early days but DeSantis’ initial moves are stunning me. He’s brought in Shane Strum as COS. Strum’s instincts have always been to the middle. I also know he’s talking to multiple prominent Democrats about appointments. He ran as a Trump conservative but like many GOPers of the 1998 to 2010 era in this state, might govern completely differently. We saw it with Crist as AG – he ran to the right in the primary of Locke Burt and Tom Warner then governed from the center-left. Same with Senate President John McKay from 2000 to 2002 whom everyone feared would be more conservative than even Dan Webster. McKay wasn’t center-left as Senate President – he was further left than most Democrats.

        Now do I think DeSantis goes that far from the conservative orthodoxy? No, but he’s already proving to be more pragmatic than expected so who knows.


    2. DeSantis and Trump have had a clear chill since DeSantis seemed to throw Trump under the bus on Maria/Puerto Rico. So watch this space. He seems to be moving in his own directions now. Maybe that changes but for now he’s becoming psuedo-independent.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. What Kartik and other lefty glades bleeding hearts don’t ever mention is that most sugar workers are African-Americans.
    For the elite progressive suburbanite river otters matter more than black lives.
    DeSantis racism makes his anti sugar stand possible not independence as this propaganda piece claims.
    Pittman lobbies for sugar because it impacts black lives.


    1. Those same jobs can be converted to ecotourism once sugar is out of business.


      1. This has long been my point about protecting our environment and its alleged “cost to business,” time and again.


    2. Quite frankly I did not even think of the racial composition of the workers nor have I considered that in prior critiques of sugar. I prefer color blindness to identity. As I stated in another reply eco tourism is an option for these workers.Thanks to Terry for bringing it up.


  3. Insider Myself · ·

    The key to understanding DeSantis’ lurch to the middle Kartik is remembering he ran without the usual institutional support. Scott did the same but instead of retaining autonomy he essentially absorbed the party apparatus into his movement.

    DeSantis wasn’t favored by most Rep insiders. In fact many were prepared for. Gillum victory. So he’s completely free of them. He’s ad libing now.


  4. You fucking bastard · ·

    Democrats see sugar as a partner because they have been generous with $$$ unlike other businesses. You should see it this way.


  5. It’s a cloudier picture. Certainly DeSantis has rejected direct contributions from the sugar industry. He’s been in this sort of feud with them for several years. There’s only speculation as to why, but my guess is that since DeSantis was initially elected to Congress closer to the Tea Party era of the GOP than the New Nationalism era, he was taking a relatively popular stance against corporate welfare for political purposes. Since then it’s only worsened; sugar was more on Putnam’s bandwagon. But that doesn’t mean DeSantis hasn’t taken money from the sugar industry by more indirect means.

    Jobs For Florida is a PAC that routinely takes sugar money. They gave him 100,000 this cycle (link:

    The Patriot Fund is another PAC that took sugar money that ended in DeSantis’s hands (link:

    Publicly of course they’re feuding, in no small part thanks to Roger Stone’s neg ads during the Republican primary, and as I said there’s a few years of history there. But public stances and private stances are two different things, and I am not yet convinced that DeSantis is privately a crusader against the sugar industry simply because he has only indirectly accepted money from them. Which brings me to my other point: according to OpenSecrets, DeSantis raised a good bit more money in 2016 than he did in 2018 and some outstanding debt to settle, which will hamper his re-election fundraising efforts. He’s already probably thinking that unless he does something to satisfy the GOP donor class in office on term 1, he’ll be hard up again for re-election funds. He’s already getting as much money as the “values” part of the conservative donorsphere can give him. That would likely narrow his options to industry. None of this means he’ll change his stance on sugar, it just means he will have the motive and opportunity to do so in the near future.


    1. All great points. The indirect money was my point on Gillum who also rejected direct sugar money but has ties to entities including the FDP that have taken plenty of it.

      My hope is those of us who oppose sugar and care about the Everglades can push DeSantis to do the right thing. The election is over and unlike the Democratic operatives (some of whom actually have worked for sugar themselves) my goal is to see DeSantis hold sugar accountable, so I will encourage him and his allies to govern on the principle for which they campaigned. I realize due to the extensive RPOF and interest group ties to sugar it will require continued effort and reinforcement.


%d bloggers like this: